On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 09:29 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > Why Web Services and not MAPI? Web Services sounds like going > through some fragile abstraction layer, MAPI seems more "direct". EWS is the protocol they say they'll support going forward; they've been saying MAPI is obsolete (or at least obsolescent) since Exchange 2007. EWS is also simpler to support, as it's "just SOAP" and doesn't pull in a bunch of bleeding-edge Samba stuff to support a complex binary protocol. -- dwmw2
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature