Re: En-dash versus em-dash

From: Dodji Seketeli <dodji seketeli org>
To: philip tecnocode co uk
Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: En-dash versus em-dash
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:26:22 +0100

Philip Withnall <philip tecnocode co uk> a écrit:

> On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 17:35 +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> Philip Withnall <philip tecnocode co uk> a écrit:
>> 
>> > Are there any reasons against putting UTF-8 characters in the source
>> > code (which weren’t covered in my blog post)?
>> 
>> Sorry, but which blog post?
>
> This one, which I linked to earlier:
> http://tecnocode.co.uk/2009/10/01/unicode-in-gnome/

Thank you.

-- 
		Dodji

References:
- =?UTF-8?Q?Using_the_Unicode_ellipsis_=28=E2=80=A6=29_instead_of_three_pe?= =?UTF-8?Q?riods?=
  - From: Jeremy Bicha
- Re: Using the Unicode ellipsis =?UTF-8?B?KOKApikgaW5zdGVhZCBvZiB0?= =?UTF-8?B?aHJlZSBwZXJpb2Rz?=
  - From: Stefan Sauer
- Re: Using the Unicode ellipsis =?UTF-8?Q?=28=E2=80=A6=29?= instead of three periods
  - From: Philip Withnall
- =?utf-8?Q?En-dash_versus_em-dash_(was:_Re:_Using_the_U?= =?utf-8?Q?nicode_ellipsis_(=E2=80=A6)_instead_of_three_periods)?=
  - From: Robin Stocker
- Re: En-dash versus em-dash (was: Re: Using the Unicode ellipsis =?UTF-8?Q?=28=E2=80=A6=29?= instead of three periods)
  - From: Philip Withnall
- Re: En-dash versus em-dash
  - From: Pat Suwalski
- Re: En-dash versus em-dash
  - From: Philip Withnall
- Re: En-dash versus em-dash
  - From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
- Re: En-dash versus em-dash
  - From: Philip Withnall
- Re: En-dash versus em-dash
  - From: Dodji Seketeli
- Re: En-dash versus em-dash
  - From: Philip Withnall

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]