Sorry for being mad, no offence to u.
First I would say I approve GNOME to integrate with an IMF, and even choose one IMF as defualt.
BUT, IMF must be switchable.
As I have said for several times, provide a interface that IMFs can be well integrated with GNOME.
There is a solution too satisfy multipul IMFs, but our points' are just Ignored , even though Wen Xuetian has said he can prove it with code!
GNOME provide machanism, IMFs provide implementation.
It's not time to discuss WHICH IMF should be integrated, it's time to discuss HOW IMF can be integrated.
I know it will not be a easy job, but it's something that should be done.
Whichever IMF u now choose as the only IMF for gnome, u are KILLING othe IMFs, so do u think other IMFs' developers work worth nothing?
PLEASE, calm down, slow down, and discuss about how to provide a machanism, and how IMFs can be integrated.
P.S. Ma said "u can switch and fork", yes, surely I can do, but GNOME user will suffer an dirty hacked input system, that's too selfish.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:05:40AM +0800, Justin Wong wrote:
> If we choose KDE as defualt and unchangable DE of linux, it doesn't make
> linux like proprietary software from micro$oft, because linux will still be
> 100% free software, and will still be developed in the open by the linux
> community.
This is completely offtopic. Please be specific in your argumentation.
The topic is how IM can be integrated.
--
Regards,
Olav (moderator)
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list