Re: spring cleaning in gtk-doc for next-next verison (1.21)

[Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>]

hi;

On 30 December 2014 at 19:08, Stefan Sauer <ensonic hora-obscura de> wrote:
> On 12/29/2014 01:28 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > hi;
> >
> > On 29 December 2014 at 12:11, Stefan Sauer <ensonic hora-obscura de> wrote:
> >
> > > ./gtk+-2/docs/reference/gdk/tmpl
> > > ./gtk+-2/docs/reference/gtk/tmpl
> > > ./gtk+-2/docs/reference/libgail-util/tmpl
> > we may port gtk2, but I'm not sure about bumping the dependency on a
> > "frozen" branch…
> The gtk-doc dependency? 1.11 is good enough, the tmpl free build was
> added in 1.8 (Feb 16 2007).

I'll have a go at fixing gtk2, then.

> > > ./gconf/doc/gconf/tmpl
> > > ./gtkhtml/doc/tmpl
> > aren't these two deprecated? we don't ship anything with gconf any
> > more for sure…
> >
> > > ./seed/doc/reference/tmpl
> > what's the status of seed? isn't it unmaintained?
> >
> > ciao,
> >  Emmanuele.
> Thanks for checking. At some point those modules will need to use an old
> version of gtk-doc to build their docs. In jhbuild we could use
> --disable-gtkdoc if we still need to build them.

we don't usually build with gtk-doc in jhbuild — at least, I don't
know of anybody that adds '--enable-gtk-doc' to the autogenargs.

ciao,
 Emmanuele.

-- 
http://www.bassi.io
[ ] ebassi [ gmail com]