Re: Discouraging use of sync APIs

[Debarshi Ray <rishi is lostca se>]

On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 06:52:13AM -0500, Ondrej Holy wrote:
> We already have g_file_read_async, it was probably typo, however
> I wonder which methods doesn't have async versions? Would be probably
> good start to implemented them if there are any.

I meant that currently:
  - g_file_read_async is async
  - g_file_read is sync

... instead of:
  - g_file_read being async
  - g_file_read_sync being sync.

Cheers,
Debarshi