Re: Changing version scheme for the evolution projects
- From: Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro gnome org>
- To: Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Changing version scheme for the evolution projects
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:41:13 -0500
On Fri, Sep 16 2022 at 07:41:10 AM +0200, Milan Crha via
desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org> wrote:
3.47.0.90 ... GNOME's .alpha
3.47.0.91 ... GNOME's .beta
3.47.0.92 ... GNOME's .rc
... here's a gap for urgent development releases up to
.99
3.47.1 ... GNOME's .0, aka the first stable release
Well you *can* use whatever version scheme you want, but that doesn't
mean it's a good idea. Even/odd versioning was very confusing for
packagers and I'm glad you're phasing it out, but doing something
different from the rest of GNOME is inherently confusing.
In contrast, everyone knows how to handle alpha/beta/rc and knows what
they mean. Just use tildes instead of periods in the appstream metadata
(43~alpha, etc.)
Michael
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]