Re: size of eps files exported

[Cyrille Chepelov <chepelov calixo net>]

Le dim, sep 02, 2001, à 08:28:34 +0100, Nicholas Piper a écrit:
> > .89 is not yet available; this was a test release.
>
> I mean is .89-test still available, or did you mean for me to try CVS ?

CVS, snapshot, or .89-test if it is still available (I'm not aware it was
pulled).

> > Except the already mentioned bounding box bug, I've never seen such massive
> > scales (YMMV on the actual size of your diagrams, however, I think I've got
> > a few onew which qualify as "extensive" if not extremely complex).
>
> I've never hit it before (I'm pretty sure!), but today I started
> getting %%BoundingBox: 0 0 -2147483648 -2147483648
> in an export :-(

This is definitely the bug in question.

> Another file I'm working on has a BB of 0 0 1614 1583, which by
> looking at the file in ghostview I'd call "big".

> I don't really want to send these files to everyone as they are
> company stuff; but as they aren't really much special yet I've taken
> the liberty of sending them directly to you Cyrille. Hope that's
> ok. Maybe you can tell me what I could do to get the EPS version to
> normal dimensions :-)
>
> overview.dia is the one with the broken BB, implemented.dia is
> another which isn't broken. Just big.

Oh, I see what you mean. Hmm. It looks like a popular request, in fact,
usually for less-capable formats.

In the mean-time, I've sent you back a "fixed" overview.eps (generated by
the CVS version), in case you need it quickly and have trouble compiling.

        -- Cyrille

-- 
Grumpf.