Re: Downloader design proposal
- From: Xan Lopez <xan masilla org>
- To: Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>
- Subject: Re: Downloader design proposal
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 12:52:15 +0100
El sáb, 17-01-2004 a las 03:21, +0100, Mikael Hallendal escribió:
> lör 2004-01-17 klockan 02.20 skrev Xan Lopez:
>
> > I agree about something like this for automatic downloads (in fact we
> > already have it, without pref). But I have yet to see a good reason to
> > why is so important for people to be able to micromanage every single
> > file they download *from the filepicker*. If using nautilus, the GNOME
> > file manager, to manage files is such a horrible nightmare we are surely
> > making some big mistakes in its design.
>
> I know I've said this to you at least in one mail to the Epiphany list
> and one time on IRC but I'll say it again :)
>
> The reason is that you decide where to put the file _before_ it's put
> there. That way you don't have to open another application and find the
> file just to move it. And chosing where to put one file is much faster
> done in the filepicker than in Nautilus (unless you have shortcuts to
> all your directories where you want to put things available on your
> desktop).
- You should not need to "open" Nautilus. It should be always opened. In
fact, as I see it, Nautilus *is* GNOME. If you use Epiphany without
Nautilus you are definitely not in our supposed user base.
- If the filepicker does a better job than Nautilus to manage files then
drop Nautilus and use the picker everywhere, God knows it's much ligther
in resources.
- If you create shortcuts to common places in the picker maybe you
should actually have them in Desktop too. Dunno.
- And yes, I understand some people prefer to be forced to micromanage
everything with a filepicker before it's actually stored in the system,
that's why we have Download Link As.
>
> > Besides, we added Download Link As... in the context menu, which will
> > show a filepicker in case you really want that. Of course, this
> > requires one more click, but I see it as the way for skilled people to
> > make their downloads, and I think we should try to design for the
> > average user, not the expert one.
>
> Yeah, but say you turn of automatic download. You get a dialog that asks
> what you want to do, do you think that you should then just get a
> Cancel. Go back to the browser window, right-click, chose Save as...
>
> I don't see how this in _any_ way makes it harder to use for the
> "average" user? That user wouldn't unset the auto download preference
> and never even see this dialog.
We could add Save As in the dialog if it's really needed. I agree it's a
kind of "advanced" dialog, so I would not complain.
>
> Sometimes you just can't make _one_ solution that fits all. I personally
> think this is such a time.
>
> Regards,
> Mikael Hallendal
>
> --
> Mikael Hallendal micke imendio com
> Imendio HB http://www.imendio.com
> Phone: +46 (0)709 718 918
>
--
"The missionaries go forth to Christianize the savages -- as if
the savages weren't dangerous enough already" [Edward Abbey]
xan, xan masilla org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]