Re: Opportunity for Epiphany
- From: Christopher Aillon <caillon redhat com>
- To: Jan de Groot <jan jgc homeip net>
- Cc: epiphany-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Opportunity for Epiphany
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:37:03 -0400
On 10/24/2005 02:54 AM, Jan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 23:16 +0200, Jeff Waugh wrote:
The trademark issue is a real problem for Debian and Ubuntu because of
strict license policy. Archlinux has permission to use the official
logos, so it isn't a real issue for us.
About XULRunner: do we _NEED_ to be compatible with XUL? I haven't seen
a single web application written in XUL yet. Most of the stuff I see is
either serverside, ActiveX, Flash or Java.
XULRunner is essentially mozilla.org's codename for "libgecko". It will
include support for XPCOM, Gecko, core networking. It will also include
XUL support. You want to be compatible with XULRunner.
Reading material:
http://wiki.mozilla.org/XUL:Xul_Runner#The_XULRunner_Runtime
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
