On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 19:29:53 +0000, Aneglus wrote: >Hi, > >what about the bookmarks database ? it's planned for the 2.16. > >Actually this database could be really interresting for the entire >gnome desktop because we could also add feeds and maybe webradios/tv. >Why ? >To let us save/share all our bookmarks easly (over the web and over the >desktop). use case : > >I used for years epiphany but soo, firefox 2.1 is really goood and >support gnome bookmark database. I needn't to worry about my bookmarks! Firefox 2.1? I thought 2.0 wasn't even released yet :-) What GNOME bookmark database? (I probably don't know enough about GNOME's architecture to realise what you're talking about here.) >For example the epilicious extensions is really interresting but should >be implemented alone. As the author of epilicious I'm a little curious what you mean with this :-) I suspect you mean that if epiphany hooks into a GNOME-wide bookmarks database then epilicious could be a standalone program rather than an epilicious plugin. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus therning org Jabber: magnus therning gmail com http://therning.org/magnus Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish. Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship by patent law on written works. Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils. -- Hector Louis Berlioz
Attachment:
pgpV6NzHXr4gH.pgp
Description: PGP signature