Re: Porting of Python extensions?



Le jeudi 02 juillet 2009 à 18:03 +0300, Xan Lopez a écrit :
> Open bugs with the extensions and me or someone else will surely port
> those, they sound pretty simple.

It would be nice to port the third party extensions listed in
http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany/ThirdPartyExtensions, at least those that
are known to work with 2.26 - these are the ones included in the
epiphany-extensions-more Debian package.

I have to say I’m also not fond of the JavaScript idea. Is it possible
now to access the DOM tree from the extensions? If it’s still not, it
sounds like a big regression from the Python extensions, from which you
can use the tons of existing Python modules.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'   “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
  `-     future understand things”  -- Jörg Schilling

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]