Re: Epiphany extensions, what to do next
- From: Xan Lopez <xan gnome org>
- To: Reinout van Schouwen <reinouts gnome org>
- Cc: epiphany-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Epiphany extensions, what to do next
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:08:35 +0200
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Reinout van Schouwen
<reinouts gnome org> wrote:
> In any case, what I miss in your pro/con list is the question of
> accessing the DOM. Currently that's impossible with Python extensions.
> If we gain this possibility (do we?) by declaring Javascript/Seed our
> supported extension development platform, I'd say it could be worth
> deprecating Python.
AFAIK using Seed won't automagically give you DOM access, you just
happen to be using the same language browsers give people by default
to mess with their DOM. What we need is C/GObject to the DOM
(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16401), and when that's done
both Python and Seed will be able to access it just fine. So unless
I'm wrong this is a non-issue in our case.
Xan
>
> --
> Reinout van Schouwen
>
> _______________________________________________
> epiphany-list mailing list
> epiphany-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/epiphany-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]