Re: [Evolution-hackers] inbox sorting
- From: guenther <guenther rudersport de>
- To: "Lars E. Pettersson" <sm6rpz home se>
- Cc: evolution-hackers ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] inbox sorting
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:16:13 +0100
> I also have my folders in descending order. Say I have a folder with 10
> old messages, I suddenly notice that I have three new mails in this
> folder, so I click on that folder and end up on the last mail I was
> looking at. Would it not be better, more intuitively, to automatically
> show the first un-read message in this folder. This as the most probably
> reason for someone to click on that folder is to see the new mails.
No, please. There is a totally valid reason to actually get back to the
last seen message, when opening a mail folder a again.
I personally do this often on mailing lists: Read a mail, notice you
need info from another folder (like Sent ;), get that info, get *back*
to the mail folder right where you left off.
As a work around: As long as the focus is in the mail list tree, a
dauntless hit on <Pos1> or <End> will get you to the top or end of your
mails.
> As
> it is now one have to click on the folder, and then jump to next unread
> mail, or click on it after having scrolled.
If I got the OP right, he only speaks about the first time visit (after
starting Evolution) to automatically scroll to the *newest* mails,
whether they are at the top or the bottom.
> Not sure if I missed something here, but for a new-comer it seems more
> intuitive to jump to the first unread mail when clicking on a folder
> with new mail.
Only the first time, please. Don't let the user lose focus. Evolution
shall not decide, what's best for the user.
...guenther
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0 ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]