Re: [Evolution-hackers] spam filtering

[Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>]

Indeed...  It might still be useful though.

On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 21:22, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> this is really only useful for non-bayesian spam filtering tho...
> 
> Jeff
> 
> On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 18:24, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 16:17, Dave Malcolm wrote:
> > > Something I occasionally find useful:
> > > 	* "why was this email marked as spam?"
> > > 
> > > It's nice when you spot a false positive to be able to track down why it
> > > got marked as spam; need some kind of UI for this, which I suspect would
> > > be heavily backend-dependent.
> > > 
> > > Currently I find myself manually invoking span assassin and searching
> > > through the headers, which I wouldn't wish on an end-user.
> > 
> > Hmm yeah, that would be nice...
> > 
> > It could make for a good 2.2 feature.  :-)
-- 
Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>