Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mail VPaned vs. HPaned
- From: Daniel Gryniewicz <dang fprintf net>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: Hans Petter Jansson <hpj ximian com>, evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Mail VPaned vs. HPaned
- Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:06:55 -0400
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 14:05 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 22:57 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 10:17 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > >
> > > No i said it was useless unless a better message-list is implemented.
> > >
> > > > I think NotZed hinted that he'd approve a global option for this, and I
> > > > sort of agreed to implement it. I'll get around to it eventually :)
> >
> > Hmmm... I use hpaned, and it works fine. What do you think is required?
> > My only desire here would be for the message list to keep the currently
> > selected message centered on the pane, rather than 2-3 above the bottom.
>
> Well it really needs a more flexible layout (i.e. copy outlook,
> again). The layout already wastes scads of space horizontally, and if
> you have less room from a hpaned view it doesn't work. Sure it works
> for wide-screen 1920x1440 displays, but although there are plenty of
> those, it might just confuse the coorporate desktop user where there
> aren't.
>
> I think as it is now it just looks funny on a lot of displays.
Well, it works fine in my 1680x1050, which isn't *that* small. I really
have no problem with it being off by default, but it's definitely a
usefull feature as is. I'm sure it could be more useful. Is the fact
that it's not perfect a reason not to include it? (Merely curious) At
any rate, I'll keep patching my evo...
Daniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]