Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Questions about merging evo/e-util/e-util.c into e-d-s/libedataserver/e-util.c?

From: Ross Burton <ross burtonini com>
To: Tor Lillqvist <tml novell com>
Cc: evolution-hackers gnome org, "Simon.Zheng" <Simon Zheng Sun COM>
Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Questions about merging evo/e-util/e-util.c into e-d-s/libedataserver/e-util.c?
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:45:32 +0000

On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 09:31 +0000, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> to 2005-12-22 klockan 12:13 +0800 skrev Simon.Zheng:
> 
> >     #include "e-i18n.h"
> 
> This file should stay in evo/e-util, and also the e_gettext() function
> that it declares. e_gettext() should presumably be moved into a file of
> its own, e-i18n.c or e-gettext.c.

I've not looked at the source, but what does e_gettext() do that the
i18n functions in glib/gi18n.h doesn't?  Is it just legacy code from the
days before decent i18n in glib?

Ross
-- 
Ross Burton                                 mail: ross burtonini com
                                          jabber: ross burtonini com
                                     www: http://www.burtonini.com./
 PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Questions about merging evo/e-util/e-util.c into e-d-s/libedataserver/e-util.c?
  - From: Tor Lillqvist

References:
- [Evolution-hackers] Questions about merging evo/e-util/e-util.c into e-d-s/libedataserver/e-util.c?
  - From: Simon.Zheng
- [Evolution-hackers] Re: Questions about merging evo/e-util/e-util.c into e-d-s/libedataserver/e-util.c?
  - From: Tor Lillqvist

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]