Re: [Evolution-hackers] inline gpg support bounty

[JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>]

On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 10:47 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:54 +1300, Matt Brown wrote:
> > 2) Required Support
> > The bounty lists the require functionality as "support of inline-pgp"
> > emails, with an extension of allowing them to be sent. 
> > 
> > Given that there seems to be widespread agreement that inline pgp is
> > broken fairly fundamentally, would a patch that only implemented
> > decryption / viewing support of received messages be acceptable?
> 
> I would personally be happy with that, but I'm not sure if just that
> much would qualify for the bounty or not (jpr?)
> 
> certainly rendering received inline-pgp messages is by far the more
> important of the 2.

I agree, it is more important.  I think if this was done well, we could
separate the two items out (sending and receiving) and pay the same
bounty for both.

-JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.