Re: [Evolution-hackers] Extending the save-calendar plugin
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>
- To: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- Cc: spamfrommailing freax org, evolution-hackers lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Extending the save-calendar plugin
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:52:07 +0100
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 17:04 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 20:09 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Since I've rewritten most of the save-calendar plugin, I've been playing
> > with some idea's for it.
> >
> > One of those idea's is the possibility to let the user define a simple
> > query on the data which will, for the user, decide what calendar items
> > are going to be exported to the specified format.
> >
> > It could, for example, let the user decide if only items between two
> > specific hours and only during the weekdays need to be exported to an
> > offline fileformat.
> >
> > Why I want to do this is rather simple to explain: My employer likes
> > timesheets. But I don't want my employer to know which meetings I've
> > scheduled with my girlfriend :-). (well, thats my personal reason)
> >
> > My current and a simple solution is to create multiple local calendars.
> > But very often I forget about this and created all the calendar-items of
> > a certain period in my life on the same logical calendar.
> >
> > The reason my I'm mailing this is: in case I'd build such a query
> > userinterface and extend the save-calendar in such a way, would it ever
> > get accepted by Evolution? The reason why I ask it first is because I
> > can, for my own purposes, create simpeler filtering scripts to
> > filter-out specific calendaring items from my personal calendar-exports.
>
> What about just exporting all items in the current view as an option?
> That way the user can do what ever search they want. Doesn't lend
> itself well to searches > 6 weeks I guess, but something to consider.
>
well, it could use the data in the search bar and allow the user to
select "shown time range" or "all", and thus it can be used for all
cases.
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]