Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patch Review process

[Rodney Dawes <dobey novell com>]

Attachments are often broken in mailing list archives, so this is pretty
unreliable for getting at the patches. Attaching them in bugzilla is
much better for archiving the patches.

-- dobey


On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 15:34 +0530, Sarfraaz Ahmed wrote:
> > So, since the main reason for having patches in bugzilla is for
> > packagers to have an easier way to release updates, I'd suggest using
> > e-p and always attaching the bugs to bugzilla. That should work for
> > people preferring bugzilla querying.
> 
> Hmm, how about always using e-p and giving links in bugzilla to the
> patches mail in e-p archives ? We could always add the "patch" keyword
> in bugzilla anyway. So, once we have a patch, we send it to e-p for
> review and add a link of that mail in bugzilla. [ This link would also
> help in browsing through all the replies to that patch. ]. But, may be
> we need to make it mandatory that all patches for a given bug submitted
> to e-p, should have its link added on in bugzilla, so that no patch is
> left out.
> 
> --Sarfraaz