[Evolution-hackers] Why a bitfield in CamelOfflineFolder?
- From: Jules Colding <colding omesc com>
- To: Evolution Hackers <evolution-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: [Evolution-hackers] Why a bitfield in CamelOfflineFolder?
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:43:50 +0100
Hi,
Is this really necessary?
struct _CamelOfflineFolder {
CamelFolder parent_object;
unsigned int sync_offline:1;
};
Wouldn't it be much better/simpler/cleaner simply to do:
struct _CamelOfflineFolder {
CamelFolder parent_object;
gboolean sync_offline;
};
??
--
jules
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]