On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 06:15 -0600, P Chenthill wrote:
> We would still need to maintain the old data to know the history though
> they may become obsolete. Certainly a lot of things mentioned still hold
> true ;)
A compromise might be to only migrate the pages with current and
accurate information to l.g.o, and keep go-evolution.org around as a
historical archive. Archived pages brought back to life at a later date
could be migrated individually. It -is- a wiki, after all.
Might be interesting to compile a list of pages we still maintain or
care about. I have a few not listed on the front page (BugzillaTopics
and ReleaseHOWTO, for example).
Perhaps a bigger issue is converting the page markup. I've noticed
syntactic differences between the two sites [1], but I don't even know
what wiki software the two sites are using. Need to see if there's
markup migration scripts out there.
Matthew Barnes
[1] live.gnome.org's markup syntax seems way more expressive and is
actually DOCUMENTED! (http://live.gnome.org/HelpOnEditing) Unlike
our own. (http://www.go-evolution.org/Help:Editing) Not to mention
the style sheets are prettier.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part