RE: [Evolution] Arguments against the outlook bar
- From: Rob Brown-Bayliss <rob ZOOstation cc>
- To: Zach Frey <zfrey lanich com>
- Cc: Rob Brown-Bayliss <rob ZOOstation cc>, Evolution General <evolution helixcode com>
- Subject: RE: [Evolution] Arguments against the outlook bar
- Date: 18 Oct 2000 20:12:35 -1200
As long as Evolution is hell bent on being the X-Outlook all it will
ever be is a poor cousin to the Microsoft outlook.
No more than Linux is a "poor cousin" of BSD and SysV Unix(tm).
Thats a bit off isn't it? I have not used BSD but from what I hear it's
a
fine product, and while there may be a case for Linux being a lesser
product
it can hardly be argued that thats makes linux second rate!
Being a second class Outlook is second rate, I really believe in
Evolution, I
believe it can be a great product (it's what I use full time for mail at
home, which is all my important mail), but unless it's a better Outlook
than Outlook, and unless Gnumeric is a better xl than xl then we have
not
achieved all that we can.
And I know we can do better, every thing is on our side, but we as a
community need to start thinking beyond mere emulation of a look and
feel, the vFolders are a step in the right direction.
And, having really though about, the short cut bar is cool, but how
about making the folder list more like the Gnome Control Center tree?
--
Rob Brown-Bayliss
---======o======---
www.ZOOstation.cc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]