Re: [Evolution] New snapshot problem

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

What exactly was the problem, as you dont say below.

Was evolution-mail looping infinetly?  Can you get a backtrace if so?
We've added html indexing and already hit a looping problem in libxml
that is used to parse it.

 Michael

On 21 Mar 2001 09:09:19 +0100, Fred RISS wrote:
> Hello
> First of all, I wanted to thank all the evolution hackers for the great
> piece of software their working on.
> I wanted to report a problem with last snapshot (2001.03.20). After the
> upgrade, when I launched Evo (after oaf-slay and killev), it didn't
> start, and evolution-mail was eating 98 % of my CPU ressources. The
> problem seems to come from one of my mailboxes. I let Evo rebuild his
> directory tree and then put one by one all my archives in it. I found
> out that it was my 'evolution' folder which was the issue. I use the
> maildir format on a reiserfs filesystem, and that with a Debian woody
> box (2.4.2 kernel). My 'evolution' mail archive takes 19M, but this is
> not the problem since I have a 21M maildir which is well loaded.
> Can someone help ?
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Fred
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution helixcode com
> http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution