RE: [Evolution] how to get around dependence check in "configure" ?
- From: "Rakich, Richard" <RRakich rational com>
- To: "'Dan Winship'" <danw ximian com>, "Rakich, Richard" <RRakich rational com>
- Cc: "'evolution ximian com'" <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: RE: [Evolution] how to get around dependence check in "configure" ?
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:23:17 -0500
gnome-config --modversion libglade returns:
Unknown library `libglade`
gnome-libs-1.2.12
yet rpm -qa | grep libglade returns:
libglade-0.16-0_helix_4
Anyways, I was able to debug most of this without the debug build. It looks
as though in camel/providers/local/camel-local-folder.c ~line 240, there is
a call to lock() which is obsolete in linux post 2.0 kernels and always
returns -1. All other calls for locking use flock() which is better, but
probably should be changed to use fcntl() as to avoid problems with locking
over NFS mounted directories (which I have). I may be wrong on this, as I
haven't been coding since forever, but this looks to be my problem.
Thanks,
RichR
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Winship [mailto:danw ximian com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 4:11 PM
To: Rakich," Richard
Cc: 'evolution ximian com'
Subject: Re: [Evolution] how to get around dependence check in
"configure"?
On 29 Mar 2001 15:41:24 -0500, Rakich, Richard wrote:
I am trying to compile the latest snapshot of evolution from the SRPMS.
configure is complaining that I do not have libglade >= 0.14 although I
currently have 0.16 installed and have also tried it with 0.14 installed.
what does "gnome-config --modversion libglade" say?
-- Dan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]