Re: [Evolution] Namespace Again ...



On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 12:40, Peter Williams wrote:
It is a bit disconcerting at first but it is the
way it needs to be done.

Needs to be done for what reason exactly?  Bad coding?  Getting around
some other bug?  I don't understand how this NEEDS to be done in
evolution and does NOT need to be done in any other mail client out
there.  Obviously the Courier IMAP issue you mentioned must have been
solved by other mailers that do namespaces correctly, why can't
evolution also solve it?

Skadz

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ryan P Skadberg                          E: skadz mindstorm com
 Director of Technology                   U: http://www.mindstorm.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  GPG fingerprint = 0B97 F771 E7D2 69B2 FF5C  5693 4E25 7E77 DEF0 CA4B
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]