Re: [Evolution] threading didn't work in reply-to-all
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Iain Buchanan <iaindb netspace net au>
- Cc: evolution lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] threading didn't work in reply-to-all
- Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:19:19 +0800
If the original mail with the matching message-id is still in the same
mailbox, there's no reason it shouldn't thread. Unless there is
something else going on.
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:32 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
I just replied to a message on an internal mailing list that I'm
subscribed to at work. I used the reply to all button, then I deleted
the OP's email from "to" (because he's on the list as well), and then
moved the list email from "cc" to "to".
Because I get my own posts from this list, I would expect it would be
threaded under the OP's email in my inbox, but instead it appeared by
itself.
I had a look at the "email source". The OP contains
Message-ID: <42C326C9 7010307 pcorp com au>
and my reply contains
In-Reply-To: <42C326C9 7010307 pcorp com au>
References: <42C326C9 7010307 pcorp com au>
Message-Id: <1120175637 26899 31 camel orpheus>
so obviously evolution understands both the OP's style of threading and
its own (good :)
so why didn't it "thread"? I have the correct view, because other
messages in my inbox are "threaded", ie. indented one below the other,
but this one isn't.
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
TIA,
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]