Re: [Evolution] Evolution release and major regressions, a longtime user's thoughts

[Andrew Montalenti <ajm pixelmonkey org>]

Art, one clarification:

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 17:15 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> And that is precisely the problem.  N+1 is appropriate for Debian
> Experimental, but not for Debian Stable.  Ubuntu doesn't have those
> designations, and when a new version of the distro is released, it is
> released with the implication that it is stable.

The thing is, Evolution 2.26 is N for the GNOME community right now, and
2.24 was N at the time Intrepid was released (making 2.22 == N-1 at the
time of Intrepid's release).  Ubuntu should have cherry-picked 2.22, but
since it was N for GNOME, it was N for Ubuntu :-D

(Hope that isn't confusing!)

Andrew