Re: [Evolution] attachments issue
- From: Patrick O'Callaghan <poc usb ve>
- To: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] attachments issue
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 12:06:25 -0430
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 17:48 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
Am Freitag, den 17.05.2013, 10:52 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 12:15 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
pD9548C44.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (probably your own machine)
mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (your local mail server?)
moutng.kundenserver.de (some intermediate relay)
That's all my carrier, whose policy I know ...
That's entirely fortuitous. There's no way in general that you can
predict what sequence of relays a message is going to go through.
... no need to presage. Look at my mails: Convinced of their divine
mission their sequence will always be the same ;-)
I think you missed the point. Certainly for a given pair of
corresponding hosts the route is likely to be quite stable, but you
can't apply that rule universally.
poc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]