Re: [Evolution] Evolution is dying

[rost52 <bugquestcontri online de>]

On 2014-05-29 19:49, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 10:12 +0900, rost52 wrote:
> > Why do you write "Evolution is dying"?
> It is an odd choice of a "Subject" and does not very well describe the
> problem being discussed - but that is in a long Internet tradition of
> vague and inflammatory e-mail subject lines.
>
> Evolution, or some component it uses in the GNOME stack, clearly *does*
> have some issues reacting elegantly with flaky servers and/or flaky
> networks.  Personally I've only encountered it when my network or server
> was broken [as a sys-admin I'm usually the one who broke it].  It would
> be good if Evolution was a bit more graceful in how it dealt with these
> issues - and that poorish handling seems to be exacerbated by something
> certain LINUX distributions do to the software.
Thanks for clarification!!!
As for SW, do you know any kind of office related without a bug??? I don'!

> > I opened it today for the first time and was incredibly happy with
> > what I see. It is a great
> > replacement for Outlook when you go Linux.
> Agree, 110%.
This makes me even feeling better because you have experience and am a newbie.


> > I am renagading from MS Windows due to the end of the XP support. All,
> > I saw so far in Linux looks
> > great. Evolution as a replacement for Outlook was a successfully
> > reached milestone.
> Agree.
dito
>