Re: [Fwd: [evolution-patches] [resend] patches for #20672 (gtkhtml and mailer)]

[Larry Ewing <lewing ximian com>]

There isn't a pointer, I've been too scattered to reply fejj just asked
me via irc and I told him I wasn't really happy with.  I meant to get
back to you but I dropped the ball, I'm very sorry.

I don't really like storing the is_autosaved logic in the html engine at
all.  Up to this point the autosave code lived entirely on the composer
side and I would prefer to keep it that way.  Is there any way you could
implement this via the isDirty method on bonobo::persist*?  I'm not
strongly opposed to this patch and rodo's approval is enough that I
wouldn't mind it going in I would just like to avoid the autosaved
references if possible.

--Larry

[1]I know someone is working on implementing isDirty afor the editor
control as we speak.

On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:32 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 17:26, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > yes, but larry has rejected the patch
> 
> I still don't know where, when and why; I would have appreciated getting
> informed on such a decision. Any pointers?
>