Re: [evolution-patches] fix for bug #62812

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

looks good (i even tested it).

On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 13:49 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> new patch
>
> On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 11:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 13:53 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: 
> > > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 00:27 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > dont bother with a search_response, just destroy it and set the search
> > > > dialog to null.
> > > 
> > > I was wondering if I should have done this...
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > infact, shouldn't it just be doing gtk_window_set_transient_for and
> > > > gtk_window_set_destroy_with_parent, when it's created?
> > > 
> > > this was my first thought, but is there any way to get the parent
> > > window?
> > 
> > the html is a widget is a window, if it requires a toplevel, you can
> > just get that too, it will always have one at this point.
> >

--

Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com> "born to die, live to work, it's all downhill from here" Novell's Evolution and Free Software Developer