Re: [evolution-patches] patch for the bug #64398 [calendar]
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>
- Cc: chenthill <pchenthill novell com>, evolution-patches ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] patch for the bug #64398 [calendar]
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 23:01:15 +0800
umm, you should not rely on an assertion to save you from a case which could happen in normal code running.
if it isn't a code error, but a possible run-time case, it should just be a normal if() statement. If it is a code error, the source of the error should be fixed ideally.
i.e. the code shouldn't crash if the assertions aren't present and there are no bugs present.
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 16:54 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 20:41 +0530, chenthill wrote:
> Hi,
> The crash in the getdeltas happened when the backend has died while
> the E-D-S is still running. In this case cbgw is NULL and getDeltas
> crashed. Have attached a patch to avoid the crash.
>
looks good
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]