Re: [evolution-patches] Re: Prettify folder property dialog
- From: Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
- To: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- Cc: Rodney Dawes <dobey novell com>, evolution-patches lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] Re: Prettify folder property dialog
- Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:04:20 +0200
Am Do, den 03.06.2004, 10:47 Uhr +0800 schrieb Not Zed:
> On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 12:26 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote:
> > On M�, 2004-06-02 at 16:22 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > > Rodney Dawes schrieb:
> > >
> > > > Some comments below.
> > > >
> > > > On M�, 2004-06-02 at 12:55 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > > >> The attached patch pretifies the folder property dialog and moves it
> > > >> towards HIG compliance.
> > > >> Any comments/suggestions?
> > > >
> > > >> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
> > > >> CamelArgV *argv = prop_data->argv;
> > > >> int i;
> > > >>
> > > >> - if (response != GTK_RESPONSE_OK) {
> > > >> + if (response != GTK_RESPONSE_CLOSE) {
> > > >> gtk_widget_destroy (dialog);
> > > >> return;
> > > >> }
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't the response always be GTK_RESPONSE_CLOSE? Why would we check
> > > > for !=? We're just going to close it all the time no matter what we get
> > > > here, aren't we?
> > >
> > > There is also a destroy reponse.
> >
> > And it presumably also destroys the window. So, I don't see why we need
> > to handle them differently, unless we are doing something when we click
> > the "Close" button.
>
> Shouldn't it remain an Ok button anyway? This dialogue takes input.
>
> And it has values which need to be applied when you hit ok. They
> can't be instant apply - reindexing a folder can minutes to hours.
You gave a random comment without taking a look at the source code.
The dialog takes no input at all. It displays the folder name in a
label. If you want to rename a folder, you'll have to right-click it and
select the rename action.
regs,
Chris
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]