Re: [evolution-patches] patch for bug #60463 calendar
- From: Jerome Lacoste <jerome coffeebreaks org>
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>
- Cc: Evolution Patches <evolution-patches ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] patch for bug #60463 calendar
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:59:21 +0200
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 11:58, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 13:53 +0200, Jerome Lacoste wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 12:51, chenthill wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > Attached a patch which gets the default zone as an extra argument,
> > > converts the freebusy time to the default timezone using the function
> > > icatime_from_timet_with_zone() . It was not showing some of the freebusy
> > > times before, since no conversion from UTC timezone to default timezone
> > > was made.
> > >
> > > thanks, chenthill
> >
> > THings like
> >
> > - itt = icaltime_from_timet (t, 0);
> > + if (default_zone)
> > + itt = icaltime_from_timet_with_zone (t, 0, default_zone);
> > + else
> > + itt = icaltime_from_timet_with_zone (t, 0, 0);
> > ipt.start = itt;
> >
> >
> > Could be rewritten without making 2 calls to the same method.
> >
> no, if you send a NULL timezone to icaltime_from_timet_with_zone, it
> will probably crash. As I said in my previous mail, you should be using
> icaltime_from_timet when there's no timezone.
I meant using an intermediate variable. Something along:
- itt = icaltime_from_timet (t, 0);
+ int zone = (default_zone ? default_zone : 0);
+ itt = icaltime_from_timet_with_zone (t, 0, zone);
Not 100% sure about the type (int) though. You may even remove the intermediate variable and merge the 2 lines.
Can't remember if the syntax (?:) is valid in C but my small test program seems to compile.
Jerome
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]