Re: [evolution-patches] timezone support in ECalBackendCache
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-patches lists ximian com
- Subject: Re: [evolution-patches] timezone support in ECalBackendCache
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:53:02 -0500
On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 10:04, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 08:40 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 16:08, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 14:40 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 11:33, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > > > > This patch adds support for storing / retrieving timezones in the
> > > > > cal-backend cache. This is needed for an upcoming patch I'll send
> > > > > separately to add timezone support to the GW backend.
> > > >
> > > > It would appear that you are looking up the timezone objects in the
> > > > cache based on tzid. Aren't they stored based on UID?
> > > >
> > > the timezones are stored based on their TZID, the events and tasks,
> > > based on their UID RID
> >
> > Using the same cache? It seems strange to have two different keys.
> >
> well, the IDs should always be different, and the ECalBackendCache class
> deals with the differences between the 2 kind of objects. Also, are
> VTIMEZONE's guaranteed to have always an UID?
Well, in praticality they should be different, it just seems improper to
use two different keys for data access (come on, you're a database
guy). Timezones are defined to not have a UID.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
Ximian, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]