On Hën , 2004-05-10 at 11:09 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-10 at 05:54 +0000, Umesh Tiwari wrote:
> > Respected Sir,
> > We would be greatly obliged if you commit
> > this patch.
> >
> hmm, I now think the patch is wrong:
>
> - for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS (cards); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < cards[i] != NULL; i++) {
>
> should be just:
>
> for (i = 0; cards[i] != NULL; i++)
>
> isn't it?
>
> cheers
Yes. i < cards[i] != NULL is wrong.
-- dobey
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part