Regards,Any comments are welcome.What do you think is the feasibility of and interest in this feature for f-spot? Is there a mentor available?Now, this would needs, of course, to be adapted to f-spot, and I must admit I am not familiar with its codebase, while to Shotwell I had already contributed. I am willing to study it, though, and, during the pre-gsoc time, contribute a few bug fixes or minor features to help me understand it better.Including my GNOME application:My idea was to integrate this with Shotwell during this year's Google Summer of Code under the umbrella of GNOME, and for this purpose I submitted a proposal. Sadly, while they were very enthusiastic about the project, there is no developer available at this point of time to mentor me.Last year I submitted a patch to rawstudio for it to work in a "client-mode", that is, emulating ufraw, including accepting the same command line options. The purpose of this being, that the manager software can specify a target file (jpeg) it wants the development to be saved on exit.Hello f-spot devs and users,my name is Camilo, I am a student and amateur photographer. For my photo organization needs, I use shotwell, but there is one thing that I miss from that software: a way of seamlessly exporting photos to be developed in external RAW software like rawstudio, ufraw, darktable, etc. I think this should happen as transparently as possible to the user, in a way that does not affect the photo manager's database. The developed jpeg should then be linked to the original RAW, as a version of the original, in f-spot parlance.
So, because this is something I'd very much like to see in at least one free software photo manager, I am submitting the proposal to you.
Here is more info about the proposal:
http://polymeris.github.io/shotwell-wiki/Home
http://polymeris.github.io/shotwell-wiki/GNOME-Application
Camilo
_______________________________________________
f-spot-list mailing list
f-spot-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/f-spot-list