Re: Yes to Publicity! Not to Anonimit! Was: Re: GNOME Foundation Annual Elections - proposal
- From: Aleksey Sanin <aleksey aleksey com>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Yes to Publicity! Not to Anonimit! Was: Re: GNOME Foundation Annual Elections - proposal
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:04:47 -0700
It will make you think about it more - but will the result be good or bad?
I don't know the answer to this question, and I don't belive you've
adequately answered it either.
Well, I do think that thinking more is a good thing :) I don't know the
answer either but
we have a system in place already. Some people are saying that there is
a new system
that works better thus let's switch to a new one. I am only trying to
question the "works
better" part. I am not so sure about that and I would like to make
descisions based on facts
instead of plain cliches "anonimity is good!".
Whether the voter is known or not has no bearing on whether a vote is
democratic or not. You keep talking about responsibility, but I don't think
you've answered the question - what is this open responsibility useful for,
in *our* case.
I thought I made it clear but let's try again. I think that
responsibility in "open" case makes
voter think about *how* they vote. If today you vote for someone and the
only reason for you is
that s/he has a cute face on the photo then tomorrow someone might ask
you "why you did vote
this way?" (remeber, everything is googled :) ) It might be your new
employeer, your new wife or
your children (if they ever be interested in this old crap 20 years
later). Would you use the reason
"s/he has a cute face" as an answer? May be not. Instead you'll make up
something "s/he was
a very good candidate with a solid program..." :)
<joke>
Only anonymous voting allows Bugs Bunny to be elected the governor and I
guess this would
happen soon in the state there I live now :)
</joke>
(fwiw, I was not completely comfortable with the idea to begin with. But I
don't think that you're enhancing the conversation by not backing up what
this responsibility will be useful for.)
I am not sure I understand this. I felt that I did explain my position
clear that open voting makes
voter think about his/her votes because everyone can see how s/he voted.
This *is* the responsibility.
IMHO, it makes voting more brain based process which I see as a good
thing :)
Aleksey
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]