On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 20:22 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > I'm a bit sad that only 169 members (out of more than 350) voted, > though. If anyone has some ideas on why less than 50% of the members > voted or on how to change this, please share them. I'd really love to > see this figure at 80% in the future. A better configured MTA would have raised that number to at lease 170. After some time, about the time the answers of several candidates came up, I erased my ballot by accident. I sent an email asking for a new ballot but no answer came. Looking back I found out why, but too late: rms roque:~$ nc -v x.y.z 25 DNS fwd/rev mismatch: x.y.z != a.b.z x.y.z [X.X.X.X] 25 (smtp) open 220 localhost.localdomain ESMTP Postfix HELO me 250 localhost.localdomain My laptop's local MTA complained: Dec 1 22:43:43 localhost postfix/smtp[15807]: DFF648046D: to=<foo x y z>, relay=x.y.z[X.X.X.X], delay=16, status=bounced (mail for x.y.z loops back to myself) Too bad. I omit details because they're not too important. If someone from board or electoral commitee disagrees, contact me by private email. Rui
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part