Re: Proposal: Shift election cycle back six months
- From: "Andy Tai" <atai gnu org>
- To: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Proposal: Shift election cycle back six months
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:12:51 -0700
It still looks strange to have the voting body to vote to extend the term of the current board, not the same as a general election.
Extending the terms of some leadership tend to happen under situations where something prevents the holding of regular elections... nothing comparable exists here for the GNOME Foundation.
On 8/9/07, Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org> wrote:
<quote who="Julien PUYDT">
> I don't have anything against the current board, BUT extending a term
> after the voters cast their vote is very wrong.
As mentioned in the original mail: "(Note that the Board is unlikely to make
a change like this without formally consulting our membership via a
referendum.)" -> that means casting a vote.
- Jeff
--
Open Source in Mobile 2007: Madrid, Spain
http://www.osimconference.com/
"If you want to start a debate on a subject, however, all that seems to
be necessary is to involve perennial target Richard Gooch." - LWN
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
--
Andy Tai,
atai atai org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]