Re: foundation application..



> This is not a complicated process, it is fairly clear and transparent
> (especially when compared with the alternative). What is the problem with
> using It?
There is none.

> At the moment we are talking about whether it is justifiable to tell all
> successful interns that they are not eligible for membership
We're not.

Problem solved. Next.

Really? GNOME have no role in this statement which went out to the OP and GSoC intern lists in August of 2014?[1]  Before denying this is a practice again, draw your attention to the last line which says" If you only started contributing to GNOME after February 2014, we ask that you continue contributing for another half a year before applying http://www.gnome.org/foundation/membership/apply/". The problem cannot be solved if this continues to be the message going out about GNOME membership eligibility. That message is not a true reflection of GNOME's actually rules on membership eligibility.

[1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-soc-list/2014-August/msg00000.html



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]