Re: Linking to non-free websites from gnome.org
- From: Richard Stallman <rms gnu org>
- To: Magdalen Berns <m berns thismagpie com>
- Cc: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Linking to non-free websites from gnome.org
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:26:30 -0500
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I think that a banner ad for Builder endorses Builder. (That's fine.)
> > It does not really endorse Indiegogo, but it does urge people to go to
> > the Indiegogo site and donate.
> >
> I would still have to say that the banner *advertises* Builder (and of
> course, endorses it too) but that it also inadvertently *endorses* the use
> of indiGoGo, in the process.
I think we don't need to argue about this subtle shade of meaning.
The substantial point is that this issue is NOT about endorsement in
general. It's about a very specific kind of case: a recommendation
that people go to a certain web site and perform a certain kind of
operation there.
Because the issue is so specific, it is ethically simple -- it's wrong
to recommend the operation if the operation requires running nonfree
software (including JS code).
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]