On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 21:29 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote:
Depends on the case I guess? If I have to go over 1000 comments probably not. There could be other reasons, but I don't know yet because I didn't manage many cases yet.
And in this particular case? Benjamin
On 25 May 2018 at 21:24, Benjamin Berg <benjamin sipsolutions net> wrote:On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 21:20 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote:Have you done so, if not, is there any reason to not make thisoffer?No, apart of the policy mentioned in the minutes.Will you make such an offer? If not, is there any reason to not make this offer in the future and in this case? BenjaminOn 25 May 2018 at 21:18, Benjamin Berg <benjamin sipsolutions net wrote:Hi, On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 21:05 +0200, Carlos Soriano wrote:Benjamin, I couldn't do in the way you mention simply becausethatwas not the request. The request was as described "accountdeletionin GitLab for a blocked user". The request was for completedeletion,including any activity.This doesn't make any sense to me. The user has explicitly requested a full deletion including all comments. You have solely decidedthatthe comments would not be removed, but there was no decision onwhetherthe comment text needs to stay as is. As such, I would expect that you explicitly offer the user to replace all text in relevant posts. Have you done so, if not, is thereanyreason to not make this offer? BenjaminCheers On Fri., 25 May 2018, 20:30 Benjamin Berg, <benjamin@sipsolutions.netwrote: On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 12:29 +0100, Allan Day wrote:* Request for account deletion in GitLab for a blockeduser(Carlos)* Carlos sent an email to board-list with details ofthis* Carlos is the only GitLab admin. He recently blockedauserforinappropriate behaviour. This means that the user can nolongerlog into edit/delete their comments. * The user has subsequently sent a mail demanding thattheirpostsbe deleted. The user has made the case that this is theirlegalright(under Canadian law) and has threatened legal action. * Comments can only be deleted by an admin. * We have a prescedent that we don't delete posts thatarestored onGNOME servers.There is a fundamental difference with Gitlab compared tootherservices though. On Gitlab comments and bug reports can be retrospectively modified by the submitter and even thirdparties inthe case of bug descriptions. So the user could delete therelevanttext even if they cannot delete the comment itself. It sounds like the request for deletion was completelyrefusedrather than complying with it as much as possible by changing alltexttoe.g. "comment has been deleted". Is there a reason for notcomplyingwith the request in this way?* Allan - why don't we delete posts? Rosanna - dataretentionpolicies are part of our staff handbook, and are requiredforinsurance purposes. * Didier - on gnome-fr forums, they offer to anonymisepostsratherthan deleting them (in order to preserve threads). Cosimo-isn'tthatwhat happens when a user account is deleted? Yes. * Cosimo - prefers that people can remove their accountratherthandeleting posts. Didier agrees with this. Allan ispersonallyinfavourbut doesn't know what the legal requirements are. * ACTION: Carlos to offer to delete the account andanonymisetheposts in the process.Benjamin_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list gnome org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part