Re: Garnome version numbers

[Michael Hunt <michael j hunt usa net>]

On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 04:25, Jeff Waugh wrote:

> > What do you think about new way of garnome version numbering? My
> > suggestion is that garnome version should be according to Gnome realase
> > version that it is building. Ie. garnome-0.18.3 should be garnome-2.1.1
> > because it builds Gnome 2.1.1 ... I know that it's not realy nessesarly
> > to reorganize whole relase numbering only from reason that the new one
> > would look better (now garnome is 0.x.x that means it's not a "full"
> > version while it's building a "full" Gnome2) but I would like to know
> > if  I'm the only person that's thinking about it...
> 
> There are a number of majorish changes that I want to make before I start
> using official release numbers (and the expectations that go along with
> them), but it is in the works. I don't even consider GARNOME to be "1.0"
> level yet, so shifting it to use the official release numbers is somewhat
> inappropriate at this stage.
> 
> - Jeff

Is there a garnome wish list floating about on the web somewhere or are
these 'major changes' just residing in your brain cells for the time
being ???

I have no major problems with what garnome is aimed at and how it is
going about doing it, just interested in your ideas about making it
better.

Michael Hunt

A bit of a garnome mailing list lurker.