Re: Stable GARNOME via arch
- From: Matt Rose <mattrose folkwolf net>
- To: Paul Drain <pd cipherfunk org>
- Cc: garnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Stable GARNOME via arch
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:55:23 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Paul Drain wrote:
> The --kenny-- tree is designed to hold the development tree for GNOME,
> while the --timmy-- tree is designed to hold the stable one.
>
> The idea being that --kenny-- will become move to 2.7.x when GNOME
> development starts ramping up again, while --timmy-- will be used to
> store a stable tree for people testing 2.7.x can come back to, should
> anything go wrong. Once 2.7 becomes 2.8, you'll more than likely see a
> --timmy--2.8.x tree to match.
Thanks, that was exactly the info I was looking for.
>
> Of course, the stable tree is also useful for legacy distributions and
> vendors who aren't yet shipping GNOME 2.6.x :)
Maybe I'll try and build the stable tree as well. For day-to-day
purposes, as well as backporting. I have a big drive now, I might as well
use it for GNOME.
>
> > Is the kenny tree no longer being maintained?
>
> Far from it, i'd expect Jeff has also sorts of crazy ideas for it once
> GNOME development starts up again.
That guy and his crazy ideas :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Matt Rose mattrose folkwolf net Visit my blog! http://folkwolf.net
He's a Nobel prize-winning sweet-toothed photographer with nothing left to
lose. She's a blind mute angel living on borrowed time. They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]