Re: garnome-daily issues

[Gonzalo Odiard <go turix com ar>]

I have the same problem with sourceforge and not is a new problem.

Gonzalo Odiard

Stef van der Made escribió:
> Hi Guenther,
>
> Thanks for the feedback. I'm glad to hear that I've not gone crazy 
> alone ;-) with sourgeforge and their download procedures. I'll just 
> keep on changing the makefiles if the downloads fails it's not a big 
> deal.
>
> I'll try the latest snapshot to see how that one performs.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Stef
>
> guenther wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 23:33 +0200, Stef van der Made wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> > > I'm finding 2 issues with the latest snapshot of garnome-daily
> > >
> > > 1 gtk-doc-1.6 is not happy with the updgrade of docbook XML to 
> > > version 4.4. After changing the configure.in and configure scripts I 
> > > could continue the compile process.
> > >   
> >
> > Thanks, Stef. :)  This has been corrected in both branches. Current
> > daily snapshots should work again. And we even released new tarballs for
> > both stable and unstable branch with this fixed.
> >
> > I really need more time for mailing lists... :/
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> > > 2 The sourceforge.net download links are failing if I don't use an 
> > > mirror site like belnet.dl.sourceforge.net for example.
> > >   
> >
> > That's an sf.net issue we can do nothing about, unfortunately. The
> > download.sf.net server we use is supposed to pick a working mirror...
> >
> > Apparently this either was a temporary issue only, or it is somewhat
> > specific to your location/ISP. I just checked all sources we get from
> > sf.net, and it worked for me.
> >
> > (15 of 18 total tarballs from sf.net have been retrieved on the first
> > 'make fetch' attempt, 2 tarballs needed a second attempt. The last
> > missing one was successful on the 4th go... Yes, it is commonly known
> > that sf.net pretty much sucks at this, but there are projects that are
> > available only on sf.net, unfortunately. [1])
> >
> > ...guenther
> >
> >
> > [1] We do switch to non sf.net servers (or more reliable servers, in
> >    general) if at all possible. Recently being moved away from sf.net
> >    are docbook-xml and libxklavier.)
> >
> >