Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 64-bit



Speaking just for myself, I don't find 2.8.0 a stale release, at least on Windows.  I keep reading about issues with the tools crashing, performance problems, slowdowns with lcms, wacom problems, etc, so I keep plugging along with the last 2.6 stable for any work I do for clients.

As much as I yearn for some of the great new features, I can't afford to risk loosing work, so I'm waiting for 2.8.1

Additionally, I have yet to port the dozens of scripts I've created and use to 2.8, and would hate to hit a situation where I needed them and had to stop to fix them. (just a lack of time issue on my part).

-Rob A>

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:37 PM, John A. Wallace <jw72253 verizon net> wrote:

Rob, hello.

 

Would you consider the latest 64-bit version a stable release, and how has the support been with it in general?  Thanks.

 

john

 

From: Rob Antonishen [mailto:rob antonishen gmail com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:39 PM
To: John
Cc: gimp-user-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] gimp 64-bit

 

I have been using Partha's 2.7.x dev builds with much success, so I just migrated over to the 2.8 builds from the same site.

Isn't inertia grand?

-Rob A.


On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:10 PM, John <jw72253 verizon net> wrote:

"Rob Antonishen" <rob antonishen gmail com> wrote in message news:5318918755619549638 unknownmsgid...
I use partha's builds.
http://www.partha.com/

-Rob A


Hello, Rob. It might be helpful to me to understand what makes you prefer his over one of the alternatives?  Also, do you use the 64-bit version? Thanks.




_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]