[Glade-users] build source or use libglade?

[duckwing duckwing ca (Carl B. Constantine)]

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Calum Benson (calum benson sun com) wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 19:01, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> =20
> > The question I have is why is this? You use glade to generate your UI
> > and then click: Build to build all the source for the UI so your .glade
> > file isn't required anymore. So why make external calls to use libglade
> > in your application vs. just build source? I can see if you use Perl-GTK
> > or pyGtk, etc but I don't see it for a C application.
> =20
> Well, one nice advantage is that when the XML file is only loaded at
> runtime, you can experiment with the layout of your GUI without having
> to recompile anything.

yes that's nice. What about finding widgets in the layout. For example,
I can use lookup_widget to get as specific widget and do something to
it/with it. Can I still use that or do I have to do something else?

Lookup_widget is created by glade in the support.c file.

--=20
 .''`.      Carl B. Constantine
: :' :     duckwing duckwing ca
`. `'    GnuPG: 135F FC30 7A02 B0EB 61DB  34E3 3AF1 DC6C 9F7A 3FF8
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+ZiSuOvHcbJ96P/gRAtWUAKC7wXrnzVfI5Huj+6Og9Si99xJi4gCgpx1b
VRuIkNi8CrRFTWnGTeV8DuE=
=XzUE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--