[Glade-users] Use GtkBuilder or libGlade in new codes?
- From: tvb at gnome.org (Tristan Van Berkom)
- Subject: [Glade-users] Use GtkBuilder or libGlade in new codes?
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:09:21 -0200
On Dec 26, 2007 11:59 AM, Lupine <thelupine at gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 11:40 -0200, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Yes GtkBuilder is the new way, here is the tracker on builder
support in glade:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490678
Can you (or anyone else) shed some light on the benefits of this? Was
there a problem with the libglade way? Or was this a house-cleaning
deal to keep everything within Gtk itself? Just Just curious, because
my Googling so far hasn't turned up any of the expected "Wow, it's ###%
faster using this" or "Wow, it this is ###% more efficient"...etc. From
my limited knowledge of C, and first couple of glances at it, it just
looks like more code is needed to accomplish the same thing.
Are we are talking about glade_xml_new() vs. gtk_builder_add_from_file() ?
Building an interface in libglade or gtkbuilder is only a few lines of code,
how could this be of any consequence to anyone ?
Cheers,
-Tristan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/glade-users/attachments/20071226/2cee9262/attachment.html
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]