[Glade-users] Glade MacOSX binaries for last version?

[dieterv at optionexplicit.be (Dieter Verfaillie)]

On 17/07/2011 20:19, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> However I think for now it's perfectly acceptable to dist win32/osx
> binaries of Glade 3.10 with the python plugin disabled until the
> gobject-introspection build eventually get's fixed.

Ok, I'll see what I can do...

> Also... I wonder what exactly is the part where the 
> gobject-introspection build breaks,

It goes further than simply not building, it hasn't been ported yet.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653167
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652827
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=650763 and
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commit/f89cdf2620726e8f25a3341e0316663d382a90fc.
Some of that commit is reviving Tor's patch from
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566

Then there's the work on py2cairo and PyGObject that needs
to be cleaned up and tested before it can all go to the
various upstream maintainers/bug databases.

I hope you're not regretting wondering about this now ;)

> > The script on the bug report assumes build/mswindows as sooner or
> > later the "32" in there is going to be irrelevant. Also that same
> > script should work fine to build 64 bit binaries by simply putting
> > mingw-w64's 64-bit producing toolchain on PATH before the 32-bit
> > producing mingw-w64 or mingw.org version. But I don't mind changing
> > it if you prefer win32.
>
> I don't really care about the name so much.

Ok, I'll leave the name as it is then.

mvg,
Dieter